Changeling Aspects


Home

About Us

Contact Us

KATHY'S KOMMENTS

Kathys Writings

Best Info-WebSites

Articles

Technical

For Parents of Gender-Variant Young

Life Stories

FtM

Sports

Support Groups

Practitioners

Advocacy

Brochures and PDFs

What's New - This Month

Google Custom Search

World Environment Sites

Books and Movies

On-Line TS Forums

General Services

Additional Links

 


Main Links Pages

For Questioning Young

For Parents of Gender-Variant Young

Support Groups

Women's Issues

Brochures and PDFs

On-Line Forums

Additional Links of Interest

General Service Links

Links from Synopsis of Transsexualism

Links from TranssexualRoadMap

International Links from TranssexualRoadMap

GenderBridge -NZ    A Great Site with a Vast Amount of Info.. See their "Resource" section.


Practitioners

Doctors

Endocrinologists

Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Counsellors

Surgeons in Australia

Surgeons in Thailand

Other Medical Stuff

Hair Removal & Facial Rejuvenation Etc


 

 

 

 

 

Queensland Police Service LGBTI Liaison

 

Australia's Internet Safety Advisory Body

 



What They Have Done In India


Canadian Cyclist 'Paddles' For Santhi

http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=6dd831e5-36eb-4eab-99ea-b11c031b8cb1&&Headline=Canadian+cyclist+'paddles'+for+Santhi

Ajai Masand, Hindustan Times

New Delhi, October 24, 2007

First Published: 16:58 IST(24/10/2007)

Last Updated: 17:14 IST(24/10/2007)

Kristen Worley and Santi Soundarajan have never met. They live continents-apart, Worley in North America, Santhi in India.

But Worley, according to a report in Gaywired, a netzine supporting the cause of gays, is fighting for the cause of Santhi and other victims of Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS), which results in the external physical characteristics typically associated with women despite having XY chromosomes, and wants the Indian athlete to get her Asian Games silver medal back.

Worley is a Canadian transitioned cyclist who hopes to participate in the 2008 Beijing Olympics and has been accepted, despite a sex change from male to female, as a member of the Canadian women's cycling team.

Santhi, on the other hand, is banished from athletics after failing a highly controversial gender test during the 2006 Doha Asian Games and was recently in the news for her alleged suicide attempt at her native Kattakurichi village in Podukotti last month.

Worley has taken up Santhi's cause and with the International Olympic Committee president Jacques Rogge and the IOC medical commission to get the Indian athlete the 800m silver medal that the she was forced to hand back to the Olympic Council of Asia after failing the gender test.

The tests were stopped by the IOC before the Sydney Olympics in 2000 after it was proved they were inconclusive because of conditions like androgen insensitivity and many naturally occurring inter-sex variations that make a mockery of the idea of testing for male or femaleness.

In reports published in the Canadian press a few months back, Worley argued that Santhi should never have been subjected to a gender test. "The very reason they stopped sex testing before the Sydney Games was specifically because of the inconsistency, genetically, of a women's makeup," Worley told The Canadian Press, the country's top news agency.

"Chromosomes do not give the actual sex or gender of a person's make up."

Worley said not only should Soundararajan get her medal back, she should have her dignity returned. "This is not her problem, this is an IOC problem," she told the Canadian news agency.

"This is a problem at the highest level of sport and how we deal with ethical issues such as this in sport."

In one of her letters to Rogge written early this year, Worley accused the IOC of creating a "very tragic situation".

"It (Santhi Soundararajan case) should never have been handled in such a gross manner, amounting to public humiliation because of their ignorance of her condition," Worley wrote. "The Olympic movement has been dealing with intersex people since the 1930s. You'd think they would have got the hang of it by now."

The same Canadian Press report also quoted from the protest letter written by Bagger, the first male-to-female golfer to play professionally.

"Why now has this woman been publicly disgraced and humiliated by being labelled as 'a woman who has failed a sex test?

"Not only that, it is reported she is now required to appeal to the IOC Medical Commission to have this decision overturned.

"Santhi Soundararajan has done nothing wrong and she should not be in a position to require a 'sympathetic hearing' from anyone."

Bagger, a Dane, was barred from the professional golf circuit when she had sex-reassignment surgery in 1995, but finally won admission in late 2004.

 

 What is Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (AIS)?

 Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome is a condition that affects the development of the reproductive and genital organs. AIS individuals are genetically male but may have male or female genitalia.

The IOC no longer does genetic testing of athletes but the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) continues to conduct tests.

 The IAAF allows people with AIS to compete with females on the argument they do not have any advantage over others since there is practically no effect of testosterone. Eight athletes with AIS competed as women at the 1996 Atlanta Olympics.

 In 2004 the IOC allowed athletes who had undergone sex reassignment to compete in elite level sports.


'Who decides what is the definition of a woman ?'

http://hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=7295ed9e-0668-40c1-93c9-ac5e12a78f99 

Ajai Masand, Hindustan Times

New Delhi, October 30, 2007

First Published: 21:33 IST(30/10/2007)

Last Updated: 03:40 IST(31/10/2007)

Mianne Bagger

Q: The IOC stopped gender testing after the 2000 Sydney Olympics, then why didn't it ensure that it was also banned by the continental sports bodies like the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) and the likes? Is it laxity on the part of the IOC or the IOC itself is not sure what to do and what not to do?

 Mianne: I guess that's the question we're all asking! One would assume that anything coming under the umbrella of the Olympic logo and/or brand is required to follow governance as directed by the parent organisation. National Olympic organisations would then be required to follow the same rules and procedures set forth by the IOC of course. As we have since learnt that the IOC still carries out sex testing, the OCA was in fact merely following IOC procedures. Although the IOC announced it would stop sex testing, it has maintained the 'right' to test any athlete upon reasonable suspicion.

What needs to be questioned in this instance is the procedure for maintaining confidentiality and anonymity for the athlete in question. With regards to drugs testing of athletes, people involved in these processes are (as far as I'm aware) subject to confidentiality agreements. In Santhi's case (as was reported in India newspapers), one of the officials who was privy to such test results, saw it upon himself to tell a member ---- or members ---- of the media. He had no right to do this and it should never have happened. Yet we have heard of no course of action to reprimand this person or the OCA on its failure to ensure an athlete's confidentiality. In the mean time, irreparable damage has been done to Santhi's life and her sporting career and has tragically led to her suicide attempt. This is an absolute disgrace and cannot merely be undone.

We read that Santhi has the right to appeal this decision but this should only be required if the OCA had conducted themselves within acceptable protocol. Santhi's rights as an athlete and as a human being were abused. There is nothing she has to defend or appeal, yet there is no one being held accountable for this gross injustice.

 Q: Is there still any ambiguity in the minds of the IOC top bosses regarding the issue and how do you feel about this discrepancy especially when medical science has proved to the contrary?

Mianne: We can only attempt to assume what people at the IOC must be thinking. There is no doubt that there seems to be some ambiguity, but it can't be about the medical facts! It seems to be how they are going to deal with the issue. As Kristen has pointed out, they have their corporate image and brand to consider. It's easy to ignore situations when they are kept at arms length and this [gender diversity, transitioned and inter-sexed men and women] is an issue that still makes most people uncomfortable to even talk about. It is more a problem of social disease when it comes to issues of sex and gender variance.

What needs to be remembered is that the members of these governing organisations are still just people. They have the same prejudices and opinions as most other people and that also seems to influence their decision and policy-making procedures. The difference with the sporting world is that it seems to be allowed to apply such prejudices in their policy-making procedures without concern for accountability.

We've seen this time and time again amongst golf's governing bodies. Their policies are based more on personal opinions and fears more than anything else and are based least of all on science and medical fact.

The IOC made an attempt in 2004, through it's 'Stockholm Consensus on sex-reassigned athletes', to make sports more inclusive. Unfortunately, their efforts still seemed shrouded by their own prejudices and personal ignorance and lack of substantial supportive medical fact. In fact, during a conference call with Patrick Schamasch in 2006, he admitted that no extensive research was done and the final decision was based on a popular vote by their athletes' commission. The result was an incomplete and personally invasive policy targeting an already scrutinised minority in today's society.

Transitioned men and women are still seen as acceptable targets in society as if we were something less than human and deserving of scrutiny. What needs to be understood is that every variation of human birth is normal and it should be embraced. Sport has attempted to define what 'normal' is, for purposes of sports, and has excluded certain people in the process. Global organisations like the IOC need to be aware of the influence of their actions and should be leading by example rather than by operating within society's ignorance and strict stereotypes.

It would be nice if the IOC might take heed of their own Charter as this excerpt states on the IOC website:

 (According to the Olympic Charter, established by Pierre de Coubertin, the goal of the Olympic Movement is to contribute to building a peaceful and better world by educating youth through sport practised without discrimination of any kind and in the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play.)

The only lesson that has been taught to youth in this case is that alienating someone of difference is ok, and it was reinforced by huge support by the mass media. What Santhi has suffered is in complete contradiction with this view of the Charter, yet the IOC seems to have spared no concern at the injustice. It is also not the first time something like this has happened, but it is now that it has to stop.

Santhi did not fail a sex test, she failed to meet the IOC's definition of what constitutes female. By failing to meet that view, she was subsequently branded by the media as a male and a cheat, yet she is neither. Any other silver-medallist would be looked upon with admiration and respect and Santhi is deserving of no less. In fact, Santhi is an incredible inspiration in light of the condition she was born with, as she quite likely competes at a disadvantage to most others because of it.

 Q: How do women athletes react when a transitioned athlete participates in an event? Is their any kind of bias/discrimination among officials, media and athletes towards transitioned athletes? How many times have you heard that you are getting an unfair advantage?

Mianne: People respond with the common misconceptions and stereotypes that exist and their first thought is with regards to a perceived unfair advantage. But I don't think people really know what that means. Unfair advantage --- compared to what or to who? Compared to what reference? There are some women on tour who hit the ball huge distances and it always amazes me that no one ever questions if they have an 'unfair advantage'. They were of course the concerns I experienced on tour when I first entered the professional ranks, but such fears quickly disappeared from both players and officials alike and are no longer a day-to-day issue.

The fact still remains that this is something that is nobody else's business. People would find it an outrage if they were required to expose their entire personal medical history to compete in sports, so why do they feel it is their right to know ours? The reality is that there could be many transitioned men and women around the world who are competing in competitive sports with no one aware of their pasts and that is exactly the way it should be. It is nobody else's business.

This is where human physiology in it's entirety needs to be understood. How it pertains to physical performance and the part that natural human diversity plays in it. 

Q: Europe, Canada and the US are developed societies so they understand the issue, but there is a big stigma in counties like India because of ignorance of the people? What do you feel should be done to create awareness?

The truth is that these ignorances still exist in varying degrees around the world and the US has not yet been as progressive as Europe and Canada. There are many people working in the US for greater awareness and education but they also face opposition from large proportions of their society who are extremely religious. The best thing to promote awareness is ongoing education and research into gender diversity.

This is where sport plays such a key role by openly embracing natural human diversity. Sport has an obligation to address science and medical facts pertaining to physical performance and cannot merely exclude certain members of society with no substantial justification for doing so. Sport is something that all people can relate to on one level or another, and is something that all people around the world have taken part in. Sport is a wonderful vehicle for the promotion of inclusiveness and sends a loud message to the world.

 Q: Do you thing the national sports federation of India (Indian Olympic Association) or the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) have not handled the matter properly because of their ignorance of the issue?

This IOC and all other Olympic governing bodies have all been aware of gender variance for decades yet have failed to act on it. It is an issue that is commonly swept under the carpet and ignored, hopefully just to go away so nobody has to deal with it. It still makes most people uncomfortable to discuss and the popular conceptions of gender variance makes it easy to dismiss and ignorance almost seems acceptable.

 Q: How should an athlete cope with the stigma, especially as has happened in Santhi's case, when the entire sports fraternity turned against her?

Mianne: How do you advise someone on how to deal with having their life ripped from them after being left all but powerless by governing organisations that are powerful and not accountable for their actions? How do you advise someone that has been publicly humiliated, judged and sentenced by global media who care more about the bottom line dollar than about the lives they might be ruining. The best thing I could say to Santhi is to carry her head high and carry herself with dignity, for she has done nothing wrong. Draw on that inner strength that gained her the silver medal in the first place. That didn't come from nowhere Santhi, that came from you. It came from a drive and determination that few people have and it will serve to get you through the biggest hurdles in life. When you have been true to yourself and true to those around you, you cannot hang your head in shame.

Q: How long do you think it will take for the tide to turn, especially when you people are putting in so much of effort?

Mianne: The important thing at the moment is that the tide is turning. The wheels have well and truly been set in motion and change is inevitable. I am the first [known] transitioned woman to be competing in the professional golfing ranks and have been competing on tour for 4 years now. Kristen has achieved reinstatement in both water skiing and cycling and is working extremely hard in her bid for the 2008 Olympics.

The best we can do is to continue living by example. The more people around the world that join us in leading by example, the easier that change will become. I have collected some sayings that I live my life and one of them is by Gandhi, which states: "Be the change you wish to see in the world".

Change will not be achieved by focussing on the problem, but by living the solution.

 Q: Are your efforts complemented by the efforts of people in other countries as well? Is there some kind of networking or newsletter by which you spread the word?

Mianne: We belong to the human race and everyday society, just like everyone else. We are just people, no different to anyone else. There are thousands of other men and women around the world, of all race, age and ethnic backgrounds, who play their part in creating awareness and education on all issues of diversity. The internet has probably played the most significant part in showing the true nature of human diversity in all it's various forms and to show that it is global. Human diversity is not specific to particular parts of the world.

Kristen and I have obviously been focussed on sports and it is such a wonderful avenue to create awareness and change. Our efforts will continue to spread globally, just like the efforts of all others around the world. The internet will continue to be a wonderful source of information and communication while we watch the change taking place.

Q: Do you have symposiums/meetings where you invite top athletes, IOC officials and make them aware of the whole issue?

Mianne: hhmmm, can't quite say that I'm the symposium holding kind of person! Kristen has made numerous presentations to sporting symposiums and meetings in recent years but as yet it is not the kind of thing I have participated in. Maybe it is something that I will play a more active role in, in future, but for now the pursuit of my first tournament win and the almost constant travel, keeps me busy enough!

LOST in TRANSLATION - PDF Article -- ( 400 KB )


'IOC biggest threat to future of global sport'

http://hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/StoryPage.aspx?id=b6ccfdbb-62cc-41f2-8a58-59eb64d999ce

Ajai Masand, Hindustan Times

New Delhi, October 30, 2007

First Published: 21:54 IST(30/10/2007)

Last Updated: 22:11 IST(30/10/2007)

Kristen Worley

Q: The IOC stopped gender testing after the 2000 Sydney Olympics, then why didn't it ensure that it was also banned by the continental sports bodies like the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) and the likes? Is it laxity on the part of the IOC or the IOC itself is not sure what to do and what not to do?

Kristen: The IOC said they stopped sex testing, Canadian Academy of Sports Medicine (CASM) played in an integral part in their decision, for the very reason of the diversity of women's gender make-ups, and the invasiveness of the IOC Medical Commissions process, which was assumed to "protect" sport (Go to http://www.casm-acms.org/forms/statements/GendereVerifEng.pdf).

The "gender parade" was one of the practices the IOC Medical Commission utilised until 2000, at international games or Olympics, in which women athletes had to parade naked in front of IOC Medical Commission members, assuring all females possessed the "sex" characteristics of being female. Historically, since the 30's, the IOC used chromosome testing, as a method to test for a person's sex. The level of variances in the female phenotype and inter-sex medical issues, which are "normal" birth issues, are well documented. Santhi is yet another victim among dozens of women who have been turned away from elite sporting events because of chromosomal variations. Many women --- and men --- never know they are inter-sexed or otherwise have "assumed abnormal" chromosomal make-up, unless they encounter developmental problems, are tested when considering to conceive a child (in the case of difficult conception), or, as only women do, learn publicly at an elite sporting event, such as the Asian games or Olympics. Men, interestingly, are spared this indignity.

This is a social condition, and a failure of society --- the IOC, OCA and IAAF --- clearly demonstrate how large the problem is, and that such large institutions are so ignorant knowing how wrong they are. Where now, we're seeing the IOC, OCA and IAAF trying to wash their hands of it. Where is IOC Medical Commisssion director, Dr. Arne Ljungqvist, who said to the media at the time, that he would be personally investigating this case?

When he knew, in 1996, (8) athletes with AIS competed under the radar at the Atlanta Olympic Games, why is he not addressing this now? The world media, when Santhi's case was leaked to the press, committed yet another enormous violation on behalf of the OCA and IAAF, by presenting Santhi as a "boy," a cheater, and even worse, said, "she deserved it….". That is just sick.

As I indicated to sport leaders here in Canada and to the IOC, this was a gross abuse and doing nothing when we know we can do better is just plain wrong. I was at my national track cycling championships when I checked my email, learning Santhi tried to take her life. That had an enormous impact on me, and only furthered my resolve to protect her and other athletes like her. I was at my nationals, and in the evening, between events, I was on email contacting sport leaders and colleagues to tell them of this terrible event.

I wrote to Jacques Rogge in Lausanne, and told him that this young women's life is in his hands and his responsibility. This is gender policy gone bad…and clearly shows what and will happen if this is not stopped once and for all.

The IOC knows what to do, and have all the information they need. The problem is about corporate image and the billions of dollars they receive annually. From what I have learned in speaking with them in conference calls, they have an astounding level of arrogance and see themselves above the laws of the rest of global society with no concern for others, nor accountability. We have seen this historically with IOC business, this is no different. This is all about the old boys' network --- and "god forbid, a few women athletes are going to tell us what to do."

The Stockholm Consensus presented in 2004, pre-Athens, regarding transitioned athletes, was yet another example of this. It was a policy with no support of research, science or due process. But a policy designed to expose transitioned athletes, and to ensure to make sport participation, and possible Olympic participation, even harder. In other words, "were going to make this really hard for you, so don't show up. God forbid, we should have these freaks of nature competing at our games…".

This is all about brand and money ---- I cannot stress this enough. You can use the recent Marion Jones case, which has gone on for (7) years, but cycling, hockey, baseball and other sports re: doping infractions are in the public's hands within months or sooner, and the IOC and WADA are all over it. But when it hit home, re: Marion Jones, delay, delay --- (7) years delay, as it affects the world's and corporate view of the validity of the Olympic games. Which in parallel we saw how damaging it was for the Tour de France.

Again, all about money, image and brand! The IOC knows better, they have the information, they sit on it, because it is not in their best interest. It directly impacts their bottom-line. They're happy to do it to others, costing millions, but when doping runs rampant in the games, "shut it down"… and shove it under the carpet as quickly as possible.

This is what happened to Santhi; again, this is where the problem lies: there is no accountability. Again too, this has affected all women, and women's participation in sport. Same battle ground, different issue.

 

Q: Is there still any ambiguity in the minds of the IOC top bosses regarding the issue and how do you feel about this discrepancy especially when medical science has proved to the contrary?

Kristen: Again, this is clearly driven by self-motivation, money, image and brand. These guys know the issues, and have been caught with the facts, and admittedly on a conference call, Dr. Patrick Schamasch, stated he did not have the science/research needed to be applied to Stockholm Consensus policy. Thus continuing arrogantly, "I don't care, I have 5000 athletes I have to protect and take care of …". In return I said, " Protect them from what, when you don't event have the science or research in the first place, and knowing how disadvantaged the athletes are?". He then asked me for the science and research. And I responded, "Well wasn't that your job in the first place…".

He said then, when asked about sex testing, "Kristen, we told the world we stopped sex testing pre-2000, but we still do it…". He said, "I can do whatever I want…. Kristen, you come to 2008 games, you play by my rules…".

The ambiguity is not with the athletes, but the leadership of sport. It is a situation, of some people having it good for way too long, with lots of money and no accountability. Dr. Schamasch said, "We're all about the games, and we cannot control what other sports or international bodies decide and how they use our policies…". He ignores the IOC's global influence and role in sport. The IOC is pushing it off to others, taking no responsibility for anything they do, unless it impacts them or the Olympic brand financially. Moral issues are thrown out the window, unless it works in their interest.

This has nothing to do with what is right, and how their actions potentially affect an individual athlete or our global society. As I continue to say, "the biggest threat and to the future of global sport is the IOC itself…".

 

Q: How do women athletes react when a transitioned athlete participates in an event? Is their any kind of bias/discrimination among officials, media and athletes towards transitioned athletes? How many times have you heard that you are getting an unfair advantage?

Kristen: First of all, it should not be public knowledge a transitioned athlete is competing in a specific group or event. Ms. Mianne Bagger (professional golfer), Mr. Jamison Green (author, educator, activist and policy consultant specializing in transgender and transsexual issues) and I have worked incredibly hard to educate the sport community and government from top to bottom, literally creating a new language. I have never been called anything negative, just a woman athlete, courageous athlete etc… It is the media we struggle with, where the second line in the article is usually, "sex reassignment surgery" to sell the article or get reaction from readers. The funny thing is that here in Canadian sport, this is no issue. The media gets frustrated when they call (us) and we say were just women in sport. They get all worked up, as they can't write about anything else other than being a woman athlete.

Typically they comment, "We need to do this, as people will get confused if we don't…" I say "Huh, why is this so hard, I am a woman athlete in sport, I have a family and career job like anyone else. Normal as normal can be… ." Do you publicise everyone's medical history? I don't think so!

But they have to throw a one-liner in, as an example: "sex reassignment surgery," to create controversy where there need be no controversy. Like the IOC, they are looking for and creating something that doesn't exist. It is their own social fear and ignorance getting in the way of the truth of gender variance in our global society. That is the threat, and it is the IOC and the media who perpetuate the ignorance for their own vested financial interests, at the risk of athletes lives, as Santhi's case shows.

Santhi, like many athletes, is a victim of this practice well known in sport circle. But as long as the money flows, everyone keeps going and washes their hands of incidents that have ruined an athlete's life and career, thinking the world has forgotten. But this particular issue is different as this is not just an issue in elite sport about our society as a whole. This is just another manifestation of the greater social problem that exists. We know that fewer than 1:1000 children born are gender variant or inter-sexed at birth. So in a population of India of 1,129,866,154 people, over 1.2 million people are affected in India along. This is just one country.

Using these simple numbers, Santhi in her own county, is certainly not alone. This emphasises the greater social problem and understanding the normality's of gender variance and inter-sexed conditions and how prevalent they are within every population.

 

Q: Europe, Canada and the US are developed societies so they understand the issue, but there is a big stigma in counties like India because of ignorance of the people? What do you feel should be done to create awareness?

Kristen: Europe, Canada and Australia are certainly leading the way - The US is catching up, but because of demanding healthcare demands in the US and constitutional structure, has created barriers and delays in the US. Where in other countries, have universial healthcare and defined human rights legislation and protections for ALL women and men in our countries.

Obviously in every country, religion plays a major influence, some more then others --- It is unfortunate, as the issues of gender are physiological issues, where people are born with these variances. The barrier is the social barrier, and a lot of the damage and misguidance historically has been done, too, by non-medical experts, who are social scientists who like the IOC call themselves professionals, scientists and doctors without medical background and again accountability, who are projecting their biased social opinions and not applying science to their research. Like most of society, which has difficulty discussing issues of gender and sex, groups and individuals like this profit by publishing their pseudo-research, feeding on people's fears. And because of public ignorance, fears of abnormality or phobias about sex, which in both cases has nothing to do with it, have penetrated and misguided our social fabric.

The best way to resolve this is with clear education and research. And by utilising sport and the Olympic Movement, we can broaden the brush to countries around the world, providing a global understanding, and not just in pockets around the world. There are many people suffering, and this is the power of sport and its social impact. Something our friends in Lausanne need to grasp, and stop filling their pockets instead.

 

Q: Do you thing the national sports federation of India (Indian Olympic Association) or the Olympic Council of Asia (OCA) have not handled the matter properly because of their ignorance of the issue?

Kristen: Certainly they have not. They violated the basic rights of the athlete and athlete code, by taking Santhi's case public. That is an enormous violation, and one that they should be legally charged for. No person's medical information is anyone's business other than their own. As well, the IOC and OCA are no different than the other 245 Olympic-affiliated bodies around the world. Everyone has the same information. There was no reason for them to have ever done this, and done this in such a bad way, as they chose to sex test Santhi.

What's always interesting: Olympic sport is always asking for complete transparency and accountability from an athlete, but they are unprepared to do that themselves…. So what's fair? It should be completely transparent on both sides of the fence. Their organisations should be legally and publicly accountable for what they did. In the corporate world or government, if this were to happen to an employee, the company would be charged. Why, then, is sport any different.

 

Q: As you can see, there is a common theme playing out. How should an athlete cope with the stigma, especially as has happened in the case of Santhi, when the entire sports fraternity turned against her?

Kristen: As I said above, the organisations should be charged with a human rights violation and reprimanded…. As I have experienced, thorough education is the key. As Santhi knows, because of the ignorance you're starting off from a difficult position to fight it and to win people onto your side and carry your cause forward. Organisations like the IOC, OCA and others, know this and use this to their advantage, knowing the athlete has few resources. Using the IOC as an example, they are a multi-billion dollar corporation. But what we have done, since they did not have the science and research, we found a hole in their assumed impenetrable wall that they hide behind. And as we have found, you can't beat science, so they can't fight it on a medical level that they have failed to provide. So now it becomes a clear ethical issue at the highest level of global sport.

It takes a lot of effort by many, and Santhi on her own would find it very hard to do. But collectively with other women -- and educated men -- around the world, it can be a different story, as Santhi is one of many stories that empower us to continue and to illustrate the abuse from elite levels of sport towards women, with little to no regard for our human dignity. Santhi is no longer alone. Never was, but she never knew a campaign was going on like this for the last several years, and that many people have become further engaged since her incident last December.

 

Q: How long do you think it will take for the tide to turn, especially when you people are putting in so much of effort?

Kristen: I certainly feel we are on the cusp of a very big change… The Canadian government has approved a financial package on research and education regarding gender variance/inter-sexed conditions in sport and outward to society. We're the first country in the world to do this, and this is through extensive education and meetings with experts. Santhi's incident emphasized the scale of the problem, and the levels of victimization in global sport and society as a whole. Canada is hosting the 2010 Winter Olympic games and wants to show the world by 2010 that we are the most inclusive country in the world. It is actually part of VANOC's direct mandate for the games.

It gives us here in Canada an influence with the IOC, as well, since our federal government is funding a large proportion of the games' infrastructure. The IOC cannot ignore us, as too many of the same people that are influential in 2010, are also engaged in this development and are extremely concerned about what has happened. The goal is to make sport better for all.

 

Q: Are your efforts complemented by the efforts of people in other countries as well? Is there some kind of networking or newsletter by which you spread the word?

Kristen: The Internet has been a great tool for this. I know many athletes and professionals around the effected by this. If the Internet and the media system we have did not exist as it does, these guys and organisations would get away with what they are doing and being accountable to no one. I think this is key, technology is changing society, and where once you felt alone being gender variant or inter-sexed, thus presumed "uncommon." Well, you realise there are millions of people just like you around the world. You are no longer isolated and abnormal, but, in fact, you are normal and unique, just like everyone else.

Key for Santhi to understand is that she is not alone, and that she, too, is normal…It is society's social sickness of misunderstanding the concept of normal, and what it looks like and who are we as a society to define what is normal or not, and that someone is not less of a person because of a assumed difference grounded in ignorance….

The great thing about technology, where years ago we were unable to do this and had to go through several corporate levels to get to someone if at all. We now can get to heads of state and the IOC directly. They have relied on their old means of business communications, and are challenged when people are literally on their doorstep and knocking hard to derive change and calling them directly in principle on what they are doing. As well, I am invited to sport and medical conferences to speak at.

 

Q: Do you have symposiums/meetings where you invite top athletes, IOC officials and make them aware of the whole issue?

Kristen: Yes continually. I do 5 or 6 symposiums a year now.

 




Changeling AspectsIn affiliation with Agender-(Aust) & Transbridge-(Townsville)

We are based in South East Qld, in Australia About Us  ... Contact Us    ( Most Art above are extracts from the Art of Maxfield Parrish© )

  ALL "WebSites &/or Links" contain additional Links to further "WebSites".   It is important to learn everything you can! But, Not all information is useful or validated, so use your own judgement.

Websites around the world are changing every day, so please let us know if there are any broken 'links' on our site. 

This Website Created ...... Saturday, 20. May 2006

Last Updated: Tuesday, 22. January 2008

Visitors since... Saturday, 20. May 2006 

Hit Counter

What a Wonderful World