Changeling Aspects


Home

About Us

Contact Us

KATHY'S KOMMENTS

Kathys Writings

Best Info-WebSites

Articles

Technical

For Parents of Gender-Variant Young

Life Stories

FtM

Sports

Support Groups

Practitioners

Advocacy

Brochures and PDFs

What's New - This Month

Google Custom Search

World Environment Sites

Books and Movies

On-Line TS Forums

General Services

Additional Links

 


Main Links Pages

For Questioning Young

For Parents of Gender-Variant Young

Support Groups

Women's Issues

Brochures and PDFs

On-Line Forums

Additional Links of Interest

General Service Links

Links from Synopsis of Transsexualism

Links from TranssexualRoadMap

International Links from TranssexualRoadMap

GenderBridge -NZ    A Great Site with a Vast Amount of Info.. See their "Resource" section.


Practitioners

Doctors

Endocrinologists

Psychiatrists, Psychologists, Counsellors

Surgeons in Australia

Surgeons in Thailand

Other Medical Stuff

Hair Removal & Facial Rejuvenation Etc


 

 

 

 

 

Queensland Police Service LGBTI Liaison

 

Australia's Internet Safety Advisory Body

 



Kathy's Komments

This page will have regular comments from Kathy.

 

"Conformity is the jailer of freedom and the enemy of growth."
( John F. Kennedy - Address to the UN General Assembly-(25 September 1961.) -http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy

 

Question of Legality

 


If a person born in the UK has been granted both a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) and an amended Birth Certificate (BC) in their preferred gender, but retain genitalia of the sex recorded at birth, how or what would be their legal status in Queensland?

Since the passing into law of the contentious UK Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA), Transsexuals (born in the UK) have been allowed to apply for and receive their GRC/BC without having Sex Re-assignment Surgery (SRS).

In Queensland, it is a pre requisite that you must have had SRS to be able to change your BC (for those born in Queensland). We accept this, but now wonder what is the legal status of those born in UK, but now residing in Queensland, who have been legally recognised in UK with-SRS and also without-SRS, in their new gender. The UK law is predicated on “Non Surgery” so allows those who do not wish to have SRS, or those that it would be life threatening to do so, to be able to apply to have their BC amended!

We wonder if those of us who have had SRS and received an amended BC in their preferred gender are now accepted in Queensland, whilst those who have not had SRS, but have an amended BC are not accepted.

Would this then constitute discrimination on the part of the Queensland Government, as the UK law that granted those who have not had SRS the right to an amended BC?

This is of great interest to those of us fortunate enough to have been recognised in UK, but now reside in Queensland. In Australia we are allowed to change some legal paperwork, either before or after SRS. The items after SRS are: Passport, Citizenship Certificate and Health Insurance Commission central records.

However, the UK Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA) and the UK Gender Recognition Panel (GRP) does not recognise the authority of these Queensland and Australian Identification Documents, therefore we have to ask the Queensland Government to consider providing a GRC which the UK authorities will find valid. (A Queensland GRC is currently not available.)

After we have been fully recognised and issued with an amended BC by the UK we are also fully recognised by the Pensions Department and the Tax Office in our preferred gender.

I would now ask, considering the apparent conflict between the UK and Australian legislations, what is our true legal status within both Queensland and Australia?

Kathy Anne Noble - 03/04/2007

President of Changeling Aspects


From: Neroli Holmes
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 10:39 AM
To: Kathy Noble
Subject: RE: Question Of Legality

Good Morning Kathy

The legal issues you raise are interesting.  Unfortunately the ADCQ does not have the role or power under the ADA to provide legal advice to individuals or groups, in the situation you have outlined.

You may want to contact QPILCH (Public Interest Legal Clearing House), the group of public interest lawyers who in some circumstances can provide advice in this type of situation. Their phone number is 30129773.

Have a Happy Easter.

Neroli Holmes

Deputy Commissioner

Phone: 3247 0902

Fax: 3247 0960

E-mail: neroliholmes@adcq.qld.gov.au


From: Kathy Noble
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 11:12 AM
To: 'Neroli Holmes'
Subject: RE: Question Of Legality

Thankyou Neroli,

I will approach them and see what can be done.

I too hope that your Easter is restful and joyous

Love and Peace,

Kathy

Reply from Queensland Public Interest Law Clearing House Incorporated  - 11/04/2007--( 232 KB )


From: Karen Gurney
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 6:29 PM
To: Kathy Noble
Subject: Re: Question Of Legality

 Dear Kathy

This is a matter that, in my view, will most likely only be decided after there has been a test case. I can see this occurring in several ways. For example: if the issue of a passport is queried anywhere during an overseas jaunt and especially in places like the US where x-ray scanning is commonplace; or the action of a disgruntled marriage partner contesting the validity of the marriage in one of the States where there is no "domestic partner" legislation to regulate the spoils of a breakdown in a de facto marriage situation.

Firstly, it needs to be remembered that a birth certificate is only prima facie proof of the evidence contained in it. A court of competent jurisdiction is the only real arbiter of the question of sex in a particular case. Currently, the common law requires surgery. In Re Alex, Nicholson CJ as he was then expressed concerns about mandatory surgery. But the "colour" of the Federal courts has changed a lot over the last decade and I very much doubt the present High Court would entertain a non-surgical identity. 

As far as your questions are concerned, my personal opinion is that:

1.  Because the common law is based on surgical status and is independent of the birth registration record (Re Kevin), a person living in Australia who has undergone surgery but has not obtained a corrected BC is still a woman for most purposes of the law. She would be incarcerated in a prison for convicted females, would be entitled to an age pension if a citizen and she turned age 63 this year, and she would be entitled to marry a man. In Victoria, she would be entitled to a Recognised Details certificate and would also be a woman for all purposes under Victorian statute law as well.

2.  In my view, the Australian citizen described in para 1 would also be entitled to a passport as a woman. The problem is how to deal with the current intransigence of DFAT and the Passports Office which refuses to issue a passport otherwise than in the sex on a BC? I still believe that an application to one of the Federal Courts seeking a determination as to sex and an order of mandamus against the Secretary, DFAT is the way to go.

3.  Conversely, a person who has not had surgery is not a woman under the common law and is not entitled to a recognition certificate as such under State law. If she holds an overseas birth certificate saying she is a woman, and uses it for example, to enter into a marriage with a man, then a court hearing a future dispute as to validity would almost certainly decide it was not valid. Can you imagine how our present Federal AG might react to the prospect of a person who is legally a man marrying another man? The Commonwealth has already declared it will not recognise a same-sex marriage legally entered into overseas so if the person arrives here already married to a man, that marriage may not be valid in Australia. She could also run into trouble with the Feds in relation to her passport if her sex phenotype became known to them.

4.  Although there is an argument that the present situation is discriminatory, it does not appear to constitute unlawful discrimination under  the Federal Act. The States are immune from actions for discrimination under their own Acts if they are acting in compliance with another State Act. 

Does this help?

Kaz



Changeling AspectsIn affiliation with Agender-(Aust) & Transbridge-(Townsville)

We are based in South East Qld, in Australia About Us  ... Contact Us    ( Most Art above are extracts from the Art of Maxfield Parrish© )

  ALL "WebSites &/or Links" contain additional Links to further "WebSites".   It is important to learn everything you can! But, Not all information is useful or validated, so use your own judgement.

Websites around the world are changing every day, so please let us know if there are any broken 'links' on our site. 

This Website Created ...... Saturday, 20. May 2006

Last Updated: Tuesday, 22. January 2008

Visitors since... Saturday, 20. May 2006 

Hit Counter

What a Wonderful World